In the USA.
The news as it trends
While “good moral character” has long been a requirement for U.S. citizenship, the Trump administration is redefining how it’s enforced—and it’s raising alarms.
On August 16, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued new guidance instructing officers to consider a wider range of personal behaviors when evaluating applicants.
This includes not just criminal records, but things like unpaid debts, past drug use, and even social media activity.
What’s new is the expanded discretion given to immigration officials.
Previously, moral character was tied to clear legal standards.
Now, subjective judgments—like whether someone is seen as “respectable” in their community—can be grounds for denial.
Critics argue this opens the door to bias and politicization, especially against immigrants from marginalized backgrounds.
Some say it could also violate the First Amendment, where free speech—including social media posts—is protected. Unlike any administration in American history, some fear this could become a tool to silence dissenting views before citizenship is granted.
Supporters say it’s about upholding American values.
But immigrant advocacy groups warn that this shift could turn citizenship into a moral purity test, where minor infractions or lifestyle choices become disqualifying.
In short: the rule isn’t new, but its interpretation and enforcement are.
And that change could reshape who gets to become American—not based on law, but on perception.
Leave a Reply