Citizens United vs. Federal Election — Gone Haywire? Mayor Adams Raises $1 Million in a Single Night.

Citizens United vs. Federal Election — Gone Haywire? Mayor Adams Raises $1 Million in a Single Night.

Money, Freedom, and U.S. Politics.

The News as It Trends.

U.S. politics is now on a prowl after New York City Mayor Eric Adams reportedly raised $1 million in a single night for his re-election campaign — a staggering sum that’s sparked questions about influence, access, and the future of American democracy.

The donors, according to reports, included real estate moguls and executives, TV personalities like Dr. Phil, and political insiders — many of whom oppose Zohran Mamdani, the progressive Democratic nominee challenging Adams this fall.

Mamdani, seen by many as a “man of the people,” is young, brilliant, and confident — relying not on big donors, but on a grassroots movement reminiscent of pre–Citizens United politics.

The Good

Adams is gaining momentum after corruption charges were dropped, and his campaign is back on track.

The Bad

The fundraiser highlights how deep-pocketed elites can flood campaigns with cash, potentially drowning out grassroots voices.

The Ugly

Critics argue this kind of donor-driven politics risks turning public office into a pay-to-play arena — a danger to American democracy, systematically designed to wipe out small donors and everyday voices that reflect the majority.

As Mamdani campaigns on affordability and equity, Adams’ million-dollar night raises a haunting question: What are donors really buying — and who’s being left behind?

Some now say the U.S. vs. Citizens United has gone haywire — a ruling that opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate and union spending in elections.

What do you think? Let’s hear from you.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Mayor Eric Adams (@nycmayor)